SQLAlchemy Migration Guides

How to replace insert(..., values=...) in SQLAlchemy 2.0

Move legacy insert constructor kwargs onto the statement object with .values(...).

Start here

The safe first move

Build the statement first, then call .values({...}) on it.

Stop before automation when: Calls wrapped in helper functions that reshape arguments. Generated SQL-builder code that obscures the constructor call.

Target shape

stmt = insert(user_table).values({"name": name})

Repo fit check

Want to know if your repo has this pattern?

Run the matching scanner locally first. Read the free findings and manual alternatives; consider paid cleanup only if supported patterns repeat enough to justify the price.

  • Local scan; no repository upload.
  • Supported findings are separated from manual-review findings.
  • Buy only when the repeated pattern is worth automating.
Run the SQLAlchemy scan first View example report See when to buy
Example scan summary
supported_findings: 38
manual_review_findings: 6
files_uploaded: 0
confidence: reviewable

Why this page exists

How to replace insert(..., values=...) in SQLAlchemy 2.0

Legacy DML constructor kwargs are repetitive syntax cleanup that good codemods should handle.

Direct answer

What changes

Build the statement first, then call .values({...}) on it.

Example

Before and after

Before

stmt = insert(user_table, values={"name": name})

After

stmt = insert(user_table).values({"name": name})

Decision path

If this repeats across the repo, open the evaluation pages next.

Start with the free scan, inspect the report, and only move to the cleanup pack if the repo has repeated supported patterns that are still expensive to fix by hand.

  • The free scan shows repeated Query.get, select([..]), string join, string loader, declarative import, or DML constructor findings.
  • The remaining supported cleanup is still expensive enough to justify a controlled local migration workflow.
  • If the scan output is ambiguous, review its findings and upstream guidance. Do not buy expecting unsupported cases to be resolved.

Typical symptoms

  • Insert helpers still rely on constructor kwargs from older SQLAlchemy code.
  • The fix is obvious but spread across many files.
  • Teams want the DML syntax cleanup folded into the same migration run.

What the product covers

  • Direct insert(table, values=...) rewrites.
  • Report entries for where the legacy constructor form still appears.
  • Links to the matching update and delete pages.

Manual-review boundary

  • Calls wrapped in helper functions that reshape arguments.
  • Generated SQL-builder code that obscures the constructor call.
  • Files bundled with unsupported execution-path changes.

FAQ

Fast answers before you decide

What is the safest fix for insert values keyword sqlalchemy 2.0?

Build the statement first, then call .values({...}) on it.

Can insert values keyword sqlalchemy 2.0 be automated?

Automate only the supported subset: Direct insert(table, values=...) rewrites. Report entries for where the legacy constructor form still appears. Links to the matching update and delete pages. Keep these cases in manual review: Calls wrapped in helper functions that reshape arguments. Generated SQL-builder code that obscures the constructor call. Files bundled with unsupported execution-path changes.

When should I buy SQLAlchemy 1.4 to 2.0 Migration Cleanup Pack?

Use SQLAlchemy 1.4 to 2.0 Migration Cleanup Pack only when this pattern repeats across enough files that manual cleanup is still costly. Use the free report and upstream guide to evaluate fit. Buy only if repeated supported edits justify the price; no paid assessment is required.

Purchase fit

Choose the lowest-risk next step.

One matching page is not enough by itself. Run the local scan, then buy only when the same supported pattern appears often enough to matter.

Buy if

  • The free scan shows repeated Query.get, select([..]), string join, string loader, declarative import, or DML constructor findings.
  • The remaining supported cleanup is still expensive enough to justify a controlled local migration workflow.
  • The team can run the migration on a branch and validate locally before merge.

What the workflow includes

  • Installable local CLI workflow, not a hosted black box.
  • Preview/apply modes, diff output, and JSON migration report.
  • Coverage notes, rollback checklist, manager summary, and buyer terms.

Before checkout

  • Stripe Checkout handles secure payment and receipts.
  • Download your purchased ZIP after payment.
  • Runs locally; no hosted API, repo upload, or production credentials needed.
  • The free report includes the evidence needed to evaluate fit. Paid summary and template add-ons are optional.
  • 14-day refund review for published-scope or delivery mismatches.