Pydantic Migration Guides

Why Field(const=True) needs manual review in Pydantic v2

Field(const=True) was removed in Pydantic v2. Use Literal types instead.

Start here

The safe first move

Replace Field(const=True, default=value) with a Literal type annotation. This changes the validation behavior.

Stop before automation when: Choosing the right Literal type for the constant. Fields where the const behavior interacts with validation.

Target shape

from typing import Literal
from pydantic import BaseModel

class Config(BaseModel):
    version: Literal["1.0"] = "1.0"

Repo fit check

Want to know if your repo has this pattern?

Run the matching scanner locally first. Read the free findings and manual alternatives; consider paid cleanup only if supported patterns repeat enough to justify the price.

  • Local scan; no repository upload.
  • Supported findings are separated from manual-review findings.
  • Buy only when the repeated pattern is worth automating.
Run the Pydantic scan first View example report See when to buy
Example scan summary
supported_findings: 38
manual_review_findings: 6
files_uploaded: 0
confidence: reviewable

Why this page exists

Why Field(const=True) needs manual review in Pydantic v2

const=True is gone. The replacement depends on how the constant should behave.

Direct answer

What changes

Replace Field(const=True, default=value) with a Literal type annotation. This changes the validation behavior.

Example

Before and after

Before

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class Config(BaseModel):
    version: str = Field(const=True, default="1.0")

After

from typing import Literal
from pydantic import BaseModel

class Config(BaseModel):
    version: Literal["1.0"] = "1.0"

Decision path

If this repeats across the repo, open the evaluation pages next.

The cleanup pack is strongest when the repo still uses direct pydantic imports and a clean validator/settings/config subset.

  • The repo has direct pydantic or pydantic.v1 imports, BaseSettings usage, safe Config blocks, or simple validators.
  • The migration pain is repetitive v1-to-v2 cleanup, not a custom semantic rewrite.
  • If the scan output is ambiguous, review its findings and upstream guidance. Do not buy expecting unsupported cases to be resolved.

Typical symptoms

  • TypeError about unexpected keyword const.
  • Models need constant fields that reject other values.
  • Teams want clear guidance on the Literal replacement.

What the product covers

  • Detection and reporting of Field(const=True) usage.
  • Guidance on the Literal type replacement.
  • Cross-links to other Field parameter changes.

Manual-review boundary

  • Choosing the right Literal type for the constant.
  • Fields where the const behavior interacts with validation.
  • Files with other removed Field parameters.

FAQ

Fast answers before you decide

What is the safest fix for Field const removed pydantic v2?

Replace Field(const=True, default=value) with a Literal type annotation. This changes the validation behavior.

Can Field const removed pydantic v2 be automated?

Automate only the supported subset: Detection and reporting of Field(const=True) usage. Guidance on the Literal type replacement. Cross-links to other Field parameter changes. Keep these cases in manual review: Choosing the right Literal type for the constant. Fields where the const behavior interacts with validation. Files with other removed Field parameters.

When should I buy Pydantic v1 to v2 Migration Cleanup Pack?

Use Pydantic v1 to v2 Migration Cleanup Pack only when this pattern repeats across enough files that manual cleanup is still costly. Use the free report and upstream guide to evaluate fit. Buy only if repeated supported edits justify the price; no paid assessment is required.

Purchase fit

Choose the lowest-risk next step.

One matching page is not enough by itself. Run the local scan, then buy only when the same supported pattern appears often enough to matter.

Buy if

  • The repo has direct pydantic or pydantic.v1 imports, BaseSettings usage, safe Config blocks, or simple validators.
  • The migration pain is repetitive v1-to-v2 cleanup, not a custom semantic rewrite.
  • The team accepts manual-review findings for alias-heavy imports and signature-heavy validators.

What the workflow includes

  • Installable local CLI workflow, not a hosted black box.
  • Supported validator, settings, import, and config rewrites.
  • Demo report, public proof, coverage notes, rollback checklist, and buyer terms.

Before checkout

  • Stripe Checkout handles secure payment and receipts.
  • Download your purchased ZIP after payment.
  • Runs locally; no hosted API, repo upload, or production credentials needed.
  • The free report includes the evidence needed to evaluate fit. Paid summary and template add-ons are optional.
  • 14-day refund review for published-scope or delivery mismatches.